Picasso: the brains behind the brawn

Jonathan Jones of The Guardian explores the powerful, womanizing image history gives of Picasso versus what he sees as an intensely intellectual, thoughtful image maker. He asserts that even the act of observing a Picasso requires great cognitive leaps for the viewer, in that we must figure out the environment and story depicted. More interesting, perhaps, than Jones’ article is the comments section, in which the dialogue immediately turns to debate, discussion, and grappling.
Personally, I would be more inclined to agree with Jones’s writing if he were to use more evidence instead of making assertions without support (a complaint you’ll also find in the comments section).
Hey, ATW followers! What do YOU think?





